Surah Hujurat Timeline – Historical Context & Key Events
Table Of Contents
- 📜 The Ultimate Timeline of Surah Al-Hujurat (The Chambers): A Verse-by-Verse Chronology & Context
- ✨ Introduction
- 📗 Surah Al-Hujurat – Overview
- 🗓️ Surah Al-Hujurat Timeline Snapshot Table
- 🕰️ Surah Al-Hujurat Chronological Verse Timeline & Contextual Framework
- 🤫 Verse 49:1-3 — The First Rule of Adab: Do Not Put Yourselves Forward
- 🚪 Verse 49:4-5 — Etiquette at the Doorstep: Don’t Shout from Outside
- 🔍 Verse 49:6-8 — The Rule of Verification: “If a Scoundrel Brings You News…” (Key Event)
- 🤝 Verse 49:9-10 — The Peacemaker’s Protocol: How to Intervene When Believers Fight
- 🚫 Verse 49:11-12 — The Social Sins: A Divine Injunction Against Community Poisons
- 🌍 Verse 49:13 — The Declaration of Human Equality: Your Tribe Won’t Get You into Heaven
- 🏜️ Verse 49:14-18 — The Bedouins’ Claim: The Difference Between Submission and True Faith (Key Event)
- 📚 References
Nothing Found

📜 The Ultimate Timeline of Surah Al-Hujurat (The Chambers): A Verse-by-Verse Chronology & Context
Mapping Revelation to History, Verse by Verse. This is a journey into the Surah that serves as the divine “Rules of Engagement” for building a compassionate and just society.
Methodology: Textual-contextual + Tafsir consensus + Historical inference — Confidence shown per item.
✨ Introduction
Have you ever wondered if there’s a divine guide to social etiquette? Surah Al-Hujurat is exactly that, but it’s so much more. Revealed in a bustling, multicultural Madinah where tribal arrogance, fake news, and social cliques threatened to tear the new Muslim community apart, this Surah is a series of direct, divine interventions. This timeline unpacks the real-life incidents—from loud arguments in the Prophet’s (ﷺ) presence to a tribe’s arrogant claims of faith—that prompted the revelation of these timeless rules for a healthy, functioning, and God-conscious society.
📗 Surah Al-Hujurat – Overview
🪶 Arabic Name: سورة الحجرات (Surah Al-Ḥujurāt)
📝 Meaning: “The Private Chambers”
📍 Classification: Madani (Medinan)
🔢 Total Verses: 18
⏳ Chronological Order of Revelation: 112th Surah revealed (placing it in the late Medinan period, around 9 AH).
📖 Key Themes: Adab (etiquette) with Allah and His Messenger, verifying information, reconciliation between believers, prohibiting social ills (mockery, defamation, suspicion, backbiting), the true meaning of Iman (faith) vs. Islam (submission), and the universal brotherhood of humanity.
🗓️ Surah Al-Hujurat Timeline Snapshot Table
| Verse Range | Approx. Revelation Period | Key Event or Context | Major Theme |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1–5 | Late Medinan (c. 9 AH) | Addressing incidents of companions speaking loudly and impatiently in the Prophet’s (ﷺ) presence. | Etiquette with the Prophet (ﷺ) |
| 6–8 | Late Medinan (c. 9 AH) | (Key Event) Responding to a false report brought by a companion about the tribe of Banu al-Mustaliq, establishing the principle of verification. | Verifying News (Tabayyun) |
| 9–10 | Late Medinan | Providing the procedure for reconciliation when two groups of believers fight, establishing brotherhood. | Conflict Resolution |
| 11–12 | Late Medinan | A series of prohibitions against common social diseases: mockery, defamation, offensive nicknames, suspicion, spying, and backbiting. | Social & Moral Etiquette |
| 13 | Late Medinan (Possibly during the Conquest of Makkah, 8 AH) | A universal declaration of human equality, stating that nobility is based on piety (taqwa), not race or lineage. | Universal Brotherhood |
| 14–18 | Late Medinan (c. 9 AH, Year of Delegations) | (Key Event) Correcting a delegation of Bedouins (Banu Asad) who claimed full faith (Iman) when they had only submitted (Islam). | The Nature of True Faith |
🕰️ Surah Al-Hujurat Chronological Verse Timeline & Contextual Framework
Here we dive deep, section by section, to understand the “why” behind the “what.” We follow the Surah’s order, but analyze two timelines for each block: the context of its revelation (Asbab al-Nuzul) and the historical period it describes (Narrative Time).
THE CONTEXT: THE YEAR OF DELEGATIONS (9 AH / 630-631 CE). Surah Al-Hujurat is a quintessential late Medinan chapter. The political situation has transformed. After the Conquest of Makkah, the Muslim state is the undisputed power in Arabia. Delegations from all over the peninsula are flocking to Madinah to declare their allegiance. This influx of new people, many of them rough Bedouins with different cultural norms, created new social challenges. This Surah was revealed piecemeal, with each section addressing a specific, real-time incident that threatened the social fabric and spiritual integrity of the rapidly expanding community. It is a divine guide to building a truly Islamic society.
🤫 Verse 49:1-3 — The First Rule of Adab: Do Not Put Yourselves Forward
Estimated placement in timeline: — Confidence: High (95%).
Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): The Surah opens with a foundational principle of etiquette (adab) with Allah and His Messenger (ﷺ). “O you who have believed, do not put yourselves forward before Allah and His Messenger, and fear Allah.” This was a direct response to real incidents. In one famous case, a delegation from the tribe of Banu Tamim arrived, and Abu Bakr and Umar (RA) began to argue loudly in the Prophet’s (ﷺ) presence about who should be appointed as their leader. Their voices became raised, a sign of disrespect. Verse 2 continues this theme: “O you who have believed, do not raise your voices above the voice of the Prophet or be loud to him in speech… lest your deeds become worthless while you perceive not.”
Referenced Timeline: Contemporary Madinah (c. 9 AH).
O you who have believed, do not raise your voices above the voice of the Prophet… lest your deeds become worthless while you perceive not. (49:2)
Analysis & Implication:
- Rhetorical Strategy: The warning is stunningly severe. A simple breach of etiquette—raising one’s voice—is linked to the nullification of all of one’s good deeds. This was a powerful lesson in the immense spiritual status of the Prophet (ﷺ). It taught the companions that respect for him was not a matter of mere politeness but was intrinsically tied to their faith. The verses establish a clear hierarchy: the final decision belongs to Allah and His Messenger, and a believer’s role is to listen and obey with humility.
- Socio-Historical Connection: The companions were a mix of people. Some, like the Bedouins, were accustomed to a rough, direct, and loud manner of speaking. This verse was a crucial part of the civilizing process of the new community. It taught them to temper their tribal norms with a new, divinely-mandated standard of respect for the office of prophethood. The reaction of the companions was immediate and profound. It’s reported that after this verse, Abu Bakr (RA) would speak to the Prophet (ﷺ) as if whispering, and Umar’s (RA) voice was so low the Prophet (ﷺ) would sometimes have to ask him to repeat himself.
- Primary evidence: The `Asbab al-Nuzul` for these verses is one of the strongest and most widely reported. The incident of Abu Bakr and Umar arguing loudly is narrated in Sahih al-Bukhari and other major hadith collections, providing a direct and certain historical anchor.
- Classical tafsir: Ibn Kathir narrates the incident in detail, confirming that verses 2 and 3 were revealed in response to this event. He explains that “putting yourselves forward” means rushing to make decisions or speak on matters before the Prophet (ﷺ) has given his ruling. It is an injunction to wait for divine guidance and prophetic instruction.
- Location/Context: The Prophet’s Mosque in Madinah.
- Primary Actors: Abu Bakr (RA), Umar (RA), and a delegation from Banu Tamim.
- Function in Narrative: To establish the foundational principle of `adab` (etiquette) towards the Prophet (ﷺ), linking respect for him directly to the validity of one’s faith and deeds.
- Evidence Level: High (strong, direct Asbab al-Nuzul).
🚪 Verse 49:4-5 — Etiquette at the Doorstep: Don’t Shout from Outside
Estimated placement in timeline: — Confidence: High (95%).
Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): The lesson in etiquette continues, addressing another specific incident. “Indeed, those who call you, [O Muhammad], from behind the private chambers – most of them do not use reason.” This refers to the same delegation from Banu Tamim, or a similar group of Bedouins. Unfamiliar with the etiquette of the city, they stood outside the Prophet’s (ﷺ) private apartments (where he lived with his wives) and began shouting his name to call him out, “O Muhammad! Come out to us!” This was considered extremely rude and disrespectful. The verse points out their lack of sense but immediately follows with a path of mercy: “And if they had been patient until you came out to them, it would have been better for them. But Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.”
Referenced Timeline: Contemporary Madinah (c. 9 AH).
Indeed, those who call you, [O Muhammad], from behind the private chambers – most of them do not use reason. (49:4)
Analysis & Implication:
- Rhetorical Strategy: The verse gently but firmly corrects the behavior. It diagnoses their action as a lack of “reason” (lā ya’qilūn), but it does so without excessive harshness. The immediate follow-up, “if they had been patient… it would have been better for them,” teaches the correct behavior through a positive framing. The final mention of Allah’s forgiveness is a crucial touch; it closes the door on the mistake and opens the door for learning and improvement, showing that the purpose of the revelation is to educate, not just to condemn.
- Socio-Historical Connection: This was a clash of cultures. Bedouin culture was often rough and informal. In the desert, one might shout to get someone’s attention. The etiquette of the Prophet’s (ﷺ) court in Madinah, the capital of a growing state, was necessarily more refined and respectful. These verses were a key part of the process of acculturating the diverse groups of new Muslims into a unified Islamic society with a shared set of values and manners. It taught them that the Prophet’s (ﷺ) time and privacy were to be respected.
- Primary evidence: The specific mention of the “private chambers” (al-ḥujurāt), which gives the Surah its name, is a direct reference to the Prophet’s (ﷺ) living quarters adjacent to the mosque. The `Asbab al-Nuzul` is strong, linking this to the behavior of the Banu Tamim delegation.
- Classical tafsir: Ibn Kathir and other commentators narrate the story of the Bedouins shouting from outside the Prophet’s (ﷺ) apartments. They describe them as coarse people and explain that this verse was revealed to teach them and the entire Ummah the proper way to interact with the Prophet (ﷺ), which is with patience, dignity, and respect.
- Location/Context: Outside the Prophet’s (ﷺ) private apartments in Madinah.
- Primary Actors: A delegation of Bedouins (likely Banu Tamim).
- Function in Narrative: To teach the importance of respecting the Prophet’s (ﷺ) privacy and the virtue of patience, further building the code of Islamic etiquette.
- Evidence Level: High (strong, direct Asbab al-Nuzul).
🔍 Verse 49:6-8 — The Rule of Verification: “If a Scoundrel Brings You News…” (Key Event)
Estimated placement in timeline: — Confidence: High (95%).
Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): This verse establishes a critical principle for the security of the state and the integrity of the community, and it was revealed in response to a specific, dangerous incident. “O you who have believed, if there comes to you a disobedient one (fāsiq) with information, investigate (fatabayyanū)…” The Prophet (ﷺ) had sent a companion, Al-Walid ibn ‘Uqbah, to collect the zakat from the tribe of Banu al-Mustaliq. On the way, Al-Walid became afraid (due to a past tribal feud) and returned to Madinah, falsely reporting that the tribe had apostatized and refused to pay the zakat. The Prophet (ﷺ) was about to send a punitive expedition against them, which would have led to a disastrous civil war, when this verse was revealed, commanding him to verify the news first. He sent another companion who confirmed that the report was false; the tribe was eagerly waiting with their zakat.
Referenced Timeline: Contemporary Madinah (c. 9 AH).
O you who have believed, if there comes to you a disobedient one with information, investigate, lest you harm a people out of ignorance and become, over what you have done, regretful. (49:6)
Analysis & Implication:
- Rhetorical Strategy: The verse lays down a timeless and foundational principle of Islamic law and media ethics: the absolute necessity of verifying information before acting on it. It identifies the source of the problem (a *fāsiq*, an unreliable or disobedient person) and prescribes the solution (tabayyun, investigation/verification). It also states the negative consequence of failing to do so: harming innocent people and feeling immense regret. This single verse averted a major catastrophe and established a crucial legal and moral safeguard.
- Socio-Historical Connection: In the fast-paced, rumor-filled environment of Madinah, where the community was dealing with external enemies and internal hypocrites, the spread of misinformation was a constant and grave threat. A single false report could lead to bloodshed and social collapse. This verse was a direct divine intervention to instill a culture of critical thinking and due diligence. It was a legal ruling that had immediate practical consequences, and it has remained a cornerstone of Islamic jurisprudence and personal ethics ever since.
- Primary evidence: The `Asbab al-Nuzul` for this verse is very specific and is narrated by numerous sources, including Imam Ahmad in his Musnad. The story of Al-Walid ibn ‘Uqbah and the Banu al-Mustaliq is the universally accepted context for this revelation.
- Classical tafsir: Ibn Kathir narrates the incident in detail and states that this verse commands the verification of the news of a `fāsiq`. He explains that some of the greatest scholars of hadith refused to accept narrations from unknown sources for this very reason. The verse established the principle that the moral character of a narrator is critical to the acceptance of their report.
- Location/Context: Madinah.
- Primary Actors: Al-Walid ibn ‘Uqbah, the tribe of Banu al-Mustaliq, Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ).
- Function in Narrative: To establish the fundamental Islamic principle of verifying information, especially when it comes from an unreliable source, in order to prevent injustice and social strife.
- Evidence Level: High (strong, specific Asbab al-Nuzul).
🤝 Verse 49:9-10 — The Peacemaker’s Protocol: How to Intervene When Believers Fight
Estimated placement in timeline: — Confidence: High (95%).
Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): As the Muslim community grew, internal disputes were inevitable. This verse provides a divine protocol for conflict resolution when two parties of believers fight. “And if two factions among the believers should fight, then make settlement between the two.” The first step is immediate mediation. “But if one of them oppresses the other, then fight against the one that oppresses until it returns to the ordinance of Allah.” The second step is to use force against the aggressor to compel them to accept a just settlement. “And if it returns, then make settlement between them in justice and act justly.” The third step is to return to just mediation. The passage concludes with one of the most powerful declarations of unity in the Qur’an: “The believers are but brothers, so make settlement between your brothers.”
Referenced Timeline: Contemporary Madinah (c. 9 AH).
The believers are but brothers, so make settlement between your brothers. And fear Allah that you may receive mercy. (49:10)
Analysis & Implication:
- Rhetorical Strategy: The verse provides a clear, step-by-step procedure for internal conflict resolution. It is both compassionate (seeking peace first) and just (siding against the aggressor). It establishes the entire community’s responsibility to act as a peacemaker and to enforce justice. The declaration that “believers are but brothers” (innamā al-mu’minūna ikhwah) is a profound redefinition of social identity. It asserts that the bond of faith is thicker than the bond of blood, a revolutionary concept in a tribal society.
- Socio-Historical Connection: The tribes in Madinah, particularly the Aws and Khazraj, had a long and bloody history of inter-tribal warfare before Islam. Fights could break out over minor incidents. While Sira sources mention several possible minor scuffles that could have prompted this verse, its true importance was as a pre-emptive legal and moral framework to prevent such disputes from escalating into full-blown tribal warfare again. It replaced the law of the jungle with a divinely-ordained process of justice and reconciliation.
- Primary evidence: The legislation concerning internal community disputes is a clear marker of a Medinan surah, as it presupposes the existence of a functioning Muslim society and state with the authority to enforce such rulings.
- Classical tafsir: Commentators explain that this verse makes it an obligation upon the Muslim community to intervene in infighting. They are not to remain neutral when one group oppresses another. The goal is not to destroy the aggressor, but to compel them to return to God’s command and accept a just peace. The verse affirms that even a believer who fights another believer does not leave the fold of Islam, which is why they are still called “brothers.”
- Location/Context: Madinah.
- Primary Actors: The Muslim community.
- Function in Narrative: To provide a clear and just protocol for resolving internal conflicts within the Muslim community and to establish the principle of universal brotherhood based on faith.
- Evidence Level: High (clear legislative content for the Medinan community).
🚫 Verse 49:11-12 — The Social Sins: A Divine Injunction Against Community Poisons
Estimated placement in timeline: — Confidence: High (95%).
Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): These two verses are a divine charter for social ethics, prohibiting a list of diseases that destroy communities from within. The prohibitions are direct and specific. 1) **Mockery:** “O you who have believed, let not a people ridicule [another] people; perhaps they may be better than them.” 2) **Defamation:** “Do not defame one another.” 3) **Offensive Nicknames:** “Do not call each other by [offensive] nicknames.” 4) **Suspicion:** “Avoid much [negative] assumption. Indeed, some assumption is sin.” 5) **Spying:** “And do not spy.” 6) **Backbiting:** “And do not backbite one another. Would one of you like to eat the flesh of his dead brother? You would detest it.” Each of these prohibitions was often linked to specific incidents or general behaviors prevalent in the multicultural and socially complex environment of Madinah.
Referenced Timeline: Contemporary Madinah (c. 9 AH).
Would one of you like to eat the flesh of his dead brother? You would detest it. (49:12)
Analysis & Implication:
- Rhetorical Strategy: The verses are a masterclass in behavioral guidance. They don’t just prohibit the actions; they explain the spiritual and psychological reasons why. The warning that the mocked person may be “better” in the sight of God challenges the arrogance that underlies mockery. The simile for backbiting—eating the flesh of one’s dead brother—is one of the most visceral and repulsive images in the entire Qur’an. It is designed to create a deep, instinctive aversion to this common social sin.
- Socio-Historical Connection: As delegations from different tribes with different customs and appearances came to Madinah, the potential for mockery and cultural chauvinism was high. These verses were essential for fostering a climate of mutual respect. The prohibitions against suspicion and spying were critical in a city that contained a faction of hypocrites; the verses command the believers not to go on witch hunts, but to judge people by their outward actions and leave their secrets to Allah. These were the foundational rules for building a high-trust, cohesive society.
- Primary evidence: The detailed and specific nature of these social prohibitions is characteristic of the late Medinan period, where the focus of revelation shifted to community-building, social ethics, and refining the character of the believers.
- Classical tafsir: Commentators link each of these prohibitions to various incidents. The prohibition of mockery was said to be revealed when some companions laughed at the physical appearance of another. The prohibition of offensive nicknames was to stop the pre-Islamic practice of giving people hurtful names. The verse on backbiting is universally condemned as a major sin, and the powerful imagery is highlighted as a means of showing its spiritual ugliness.
- Location/Context: Madinah.
- Primary Actors: The Muslim community.
- Function in Narrative: To lay down the core principles of Islamic social ethics, prohibiting the major sins of the tongue and heart that destroy community cohesion and trust.
- Evidence Level: High (foundational Islamic ethics).
🌍 Verse 49:13 — The Declaration of Human Equality: Your Tribe Won’t Get You into Heaven
Estimated placement in timeline: — Confidence: Medium (85%).
Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): This single verse is one of the most powerful and revolutionary statements on human equality in any religious text. “O mankind, indeed We have created you from male and female and made you peoples and tribes that you may know one another. Indeed, the most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you.” While its message is timeless, many historical sources link its revelation to a specific moment during the Conquest of Makkah. After the city was conquered, the Prophet (ﷺ) asked Bilal ibn Rabah, a black man and former slave, to climb atop the Kaaba and give the call to prayer (Adhan). Some of the arrogant Qurayshi nobles were disgusted, with one remarking, “Cannot Muhammad find anyone better than this black crow to call the prayer?” This verse was the divine response to that racism and tribal arrogance.
Referenced Timeline: All of Human History, with a probable link to the Conquest of Makkah (8 AH).
Indeed, the most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you. (49:13)
Analysis & Implication:
- Rhetorical Strategy: The verse begins with a universal address, “O mankind” (Yā ayyuhan-nās), signaling that its message transcends the Muslim community and applies to all of humanity. It affirms the diversity of humanity (“peoples and tribes”) but gives it a new, positive purpose: “that you may know one another” (lita’ārafū)—for mutual acquaintance and cooperation, not for pride and conflict. It then completely demolishes all worldly metrics of nobility—race, wealth, lineage—and replaces them with a single, divine criterion: **taqwa** (righteousness, God-consciousness).
- Socio-Historical Connection: In the deeply stratified, tribalistic society of 7th-century Arabia, where lineage (`nasab`) was the ultimate measure of a person’s worth, this verse was a social revolution. The act of having Bilal, a man who would have been considered at the very bottom of the social hierarchy, stand on the most sacred site in Arabia and call the elite to prayer was a powerful, symbolic enactment of this verse. It was a practical demonstration that in Islam, piety, not pedigree, is what grants a person true honor.
- Primary evidence: While the verse is Madani, its specific timing is debated. However, the strong tradition linking it to the Conquest of Makkah and Bilal’s Adhan provides a compelling and fitting historical context that perfectly illustrates its meaning.
- Classical tafsir: Ibn Kathir and other commentators narrate the story of Bilal’s Adhan from the Kaaba as a potential context for this verse. They explain that the verse was revealed to eradicate the remnants of Jahiliyyah pride in lineage and race. Allah makes it clear that all human beings are equal in their origin (from Adam and Eve) and that the only thing that differentiates them in His sight is their level of piety.
- Location/Context: Madinah (or Makkah at the time of the conquest).
- Primary Actors: All of humanity.
- Function in Narrative: To provide the ultimate Islamic declaration of human equality, demolishing the false standards of racism and tribalism and establishing piety (taqwa) as the sole criterion for nobility.
- Evidence Level: High (as a core principle); Medium (for the specific link to Bilal’s Adhan).
🏜️ Verse 49:14-18 — The Bedouins’ Claim: The Difference Between Submission and True Faith (Key Event)
Estimated placement in timeline: — Confidence: High (95%).
Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): The Surah concludes by addressing another real-time incident from the Year of Delegations. A group of Bedouins, the Banu Asad, came to the Prophet (ﷺ) after a time of famine. They accepted Islam to save themselves and then came boasting, “We have believed,” trying to make the Prophet (ﷺ) feel indebted to them for converting without a fight. This verse was revealed to correct their arrogant attitude and to teach a crucial theological lesson. “The Bedouins say, ‘We have believed.’ Say, ‘You have not [yet] believed; but say [instead], ‘We have submitted (aslamnā),’ for faith (īmān) has not yet entered your hearts.'” The verses then define what true faith is: belief in Allah and His Messenger, followed by a life of struggle and sacrifice with one’s wealth and person. The Surah ends by reminding them not to feel they are doing Allah a favor, but that “Allah has conferred a favor upon you that He has guided you to the faith.”
Referenced Timeline: Contemporary Madinah (c. 9 AH).
The Bedouins say, “We have believed.” Say, “You have not [yet] believed; but say [instead], ‘We have submitted,’ for faith has not yet entered your hearts.” (49:14)
Analysis & Implication:
- Rhetorical Strategy: The verse makes a critical distinction between **Islam** (outward submission, which grants one legal status and rights as a Muslim) and **Iman** (deep, internal, sincere faith). It does not reject the Bedouins’ conversion but puts it in its proper place. Their submission is accepted, but their claim to the high station of “believer” is premature. This was an educational correction, not a condemnation. The definition of the true believer (`mu’min`) as one who struggles and sacrifices serves as the benchmark they should aspire to.
- Socio-Historical Connection: In the Year of Delegations, many tribes came to Madinah to accept Islam for political or economic reasons. Their conversions were often pragmatic. This verse provided the Prophet (ﷺ) and the community with the theological framework to handle this new reality. It taught them to accept the outward submission of these new converts, granting them the rights of Muslims, while also understanding that true, heartfelt faith was a deeper matter that would take time to develop and would need to be proven through action and sacrifice.
- Primary evidence: The specific mention of “the Bedouins” (al-a’rāb) and their boastful claim is a direct reference to the events of the Year of Delegations, a well-documented period in the late Medinan phase.
- Classical tafsir: Ibn Kathir and other commentators confirm that this verse was revealed about the Banu Asad tribe. They wanted to be given charity and also claim the high rank of the early believers (the Muhajirun and Ansar). This verse was revealed to teach them the proper adab and to clarify the different levels of faith. It establishes the important theological principle that Islam is the outward declaration and Iman is the inward conviction, and that Iman is a higher station than Islam.
- Location/Context: Madinah.
- Primary Actors: A delegation of Bedouins from the Banu Asad tribe.
- Function in Narrative: To make a crucial theological distinction between outward submission (Islam) and sincere, proven faith (Iman), and to correct the arrogant attitude of new converts.
- Evidence Level: High (strong, specific Asbab al-Nuzul).
📚 References
Share this article
Written by : TheLastDialogue
A Synthesis of Religions: The Case of God
Praise belongs to God, the Lord of all realms, the Originator of the heavens and the earth, the One who shaped the human being from clay and breathed into him of His Spirit; the One who sent Messengers, one after another, bearing truth, guidance, and the balance, so that mankind may stand upon justice and not transgress its bounds.
Here is a discourse meant not to conquer but to illuminate, Not to divide but to gather, Not to exalt the writer but to exalt the Word of God. So approach with hearts unburdened, With intellects awakened, With spirits yearning for the Mercy of the All-Merciful. For the earth endures by His command, And knowledge is a trust, And every soul shall be returned to its Lord.
The Last Dialogue (thelastdialogue.org) recognized as a pivotal resource in comparative theology. It is an individual initiative aimed at fulfilling God’s Will by raising the standard of human intellect and discourse and foster a world enveloped in God’s Mercy.
With a reputation for accuracy and depth, the platform is extensively cited by researchers and seekers of truth on Wikipedia and major discussion forums like Reddit and Quora. It serves as a meeting point for Abrahamic traditions, garnering respect and citations from scholars of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam alike.
It distinguishes itself as the sole religious platform adhering to the noble tradition of not soliciting charity, zakat, or donations – a practice aligned with the true Sunnah of Prophets.
قُلْ مَا أَسْأَلُكُمْ عَلَيْهِ مِنْ أَجْرٍ وَمَا أَنَا مِنَ الْمُتَكَلِّفِينَ
Say, "I do not ask you for this any payment, and I am not of the pretentious.





