Surah Jathiyah Timeline – Historical Context & Key Events
Table Of Contents
- 📜 The Ultimate Timeline of Surah Al-Jathiyah (The Kneeling): A Verse-by-Verse Chronology & Context
- ✨ Introduction
- 📗 Surah Al-Jathiyah – Overview
- 🗓️ Surah Al-Jathiyah Timeline Snapshot Table
- 🕰️ Surah Al-Jathiyah Chronological Verse Timeline & Contextual Framework
- 📖 Verse 45:1-5 — The Universe as an Open Book of Signs
- arrogant Verse 45:6-11 — The Profile of a Sinner: The Arrogant, Sinful Liar
- 🌊 Verse 45:12-15 — The Subjugated Universe and the Burden of Choice
- 📜 Verse 45:16-20 — The Case Study of the Children of Israel: A Lesson in Division
- ⚖️ Verse 45:21-23 — The God of Personal Whim: A Diagnosis of Modernity
- ⏳ Verse 45:24-26 — The Atheist’s Creed: “It is Only Time That Destroys Us”
- kneeling Verse 45:27-32 — The Day of Kneeling: Every Nation and Its Book
- 👑 Verse 45:33-37 — The Final Declaration of Majesty
- 📚 References
Nothing Found

📜 The Ultimate Timeline of Surah Al-Jathiyah (The Kneeling): A Verse-by-Verse Chronology & Context
Mapping Revelation to History, Verse by Verse. This is a journey into the Surah that foretells a day when every nation will be on its knees, facing its unalterable record.
Methodology: Textual-contextual + Tafsir consensus + Historical inference — Confidence shown per item.
✨ Introduction
What if the person you worship most is your own ego? Surah Al-Jathiyah delivers a piercing diagnosis of a spiritual disease that plagued 7th-century Makkah and continues to afflict humanity today: taking one’s own desires as a god. This Surah is a powerful intellectual and spiritual critique of arrogance, materialism, and the denial of accountability. This timeline unpacks how each verse builds a case against this mindset, culminating in the terrifying and humbling vision of every community, from the beginning of time to the end, kneeling before its unvarnished record on the Day of Judgment.
📗 Surah Al-Jathiyah – Overview
📝 Meaning: “The Kneeling”
📍 Classification: Makki (Meccan)
🔢 Total Verses: 37
⏳ Chronological Order of Revelation: 65th Surah revealed (placing it in the late Meccan period).
📖 Key Themes: The signs (Ayat) of Allah in the universe, the arrogance of those who deny the Qur’an, the folly of taking one’s desires as a god, the certainty of the Resurrection, and the final scene of every nation kneeling to receive its judgment.
🗓️ Surah Al-Jathiyah Timeline Snapshot Table
| Verse Range | Approx. Revelation Period | Key Event or Context | Major Theme |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1–11 | Late Meccan (c. 619-622 CE) | Establishing the Qur’an’s authority and contrasting the signs in creation with the arrogance of the “sinful liar” who rejects them. | Revelation vs. Arrogance |
| 12–20 | Late Meccan | Recounting Allah’s favors, especially to the Children of Israel, as a historical lesson in gratitude versus division and the importance of divinely revealed law (Shari’ah). | Divine Favors & Law |
| 21–26 | Late Meccan | A powerful critique of materialism and the denial of the Hereafter, diagnosing the worship of personal desire (`hawa`). | Critique of Materialism |
| 27–37 | Late Meccan | The climactic vision of the Day of Judgment, where every nation is kneeling (`jathiyah`), facing its book of deeds, and acknowledging God’s ultimate majesty. | The Final Judgment |
🕰️ Surah Al-Jathiyah Chronological Verse Timeline & Contextual Framework
Here we dive deep, section by section, to understand the “why” behind the “what.” We follow the Surah’s order, but analyze two timelines for each block: the context of its revelation (Asbab al-Nuzul) and the historical period it describes (Narrative Time).
REVELATION CONTEXT: This Surah is part of the “Ha-Mim” series, revealed in the late Meccan period. The conflict is no longer a simple debate; it’s an entrenched ideological war. The Quraysh are not just disbelieving; they are actively mocking the verses, displaying a deep-seated arrogance, and promoting a worldview where this life is all that matters. This Surah is a direct, systematic takedown of that arrogant, materialistic mindset, using logic, historical precedent, and a powerful vision of the final reckoning.
📖 Verse 45:1-5 — The Universe as an Open Book of Signs
Estimated placement in timeline: — Confidence: High (95%).
Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): The Surah begins with the powerful letters “Ha, Mim,” immediately followed by a declaration of the Qur’an’s divine source: “The revelation of the Book is from Allah, the Exalted in Might, the Wise.” This sets the stage by establishing the supreme authority of the message. The verses then immediately pivot to the “other” book of revelation: the universe itself. “Indeed, in the heavens and earth are signs for the believers.” A rapid-fire list of these signs follows: the creation of humanity, the diversity of animal life, the alternation of night and day, the provision sent down in rain that revives the dead earth, and the changing of the winds. Each of these is presented as a clear “sign” (ayah) for those who use their reason and faith.
Referenced Timeline: The Continuous Present (observable signs in the natural world).
Indeed, in the heavens and earth are signs for the believers. And in your creation and what He disperses of moving creatures are signs for a people who are certain [in faith]. (45:3-4)
Analysis & Implication:
- Rhetorical Strategy: The opening establishes two parallel sources of truth: the recited revelation (the Qur’an) and the cosmic revelation (the universe). The argument is that both originate from the same source and point to the same reality. By listing a series of undeniable, observable phenomena, the Surah builds a rational foundation for belief. The message is clear: the evidence for God’s power and wisdom is not hidden or obscure; it is all around you, from the stars above to the animals on the ground, and even within your own bodies.
- Socio-Historical Connection: For the 7th-century Arabs, who lived in close connection with the natural world, these signs were part of their daily experience. The changing of the winds was crucial for trade and travel, the rain was the source of life, and the stars were their guides in the desert. This passage took their familiar world and re-enchanted it, turning it from a mere collection of phenomena into a coherent system of divine signs. It challenged them to move beyond a superficial observation of nature to a deeper reflection on its ultimate cause and purpose.
- Primary evidence: The use of natural signs (ayat kawniyyah) as proofs for Tawhid is a foundational method of Qur’anic argumentation, especially prominent in Meccan surahs aimed at building a rational case for faith.
- Classical tafsir: Ibn Kathir explains that Allah (SWT) guides His servants to reflect on His creation as a means of recognizing the greatness of the Creator. He details how each of these signs—from the intricate design of the heavens to the precise mechanism of the winds and rain—points to an All-Powerful, All-Wise designer, making polytheism seem utterly irrational in comparison.
- Location/Context: Makkah.
- Primary Actors: Allah as the Creator, the universe as His evidence.
- Function in Narrative: To establish that the universe itself is a book of “signs” that testifies to the same truths found in the revealed Book (the Qur’an), thereby building a rational case for belief.
- Evidence Level: High (classic Qur’anic rhetorical style).
arrogant Verse 45:6-11 — The Profile of a Sinner: The Arrogant, Sinful Liar
Estimated placement in timeline: — Confidence: High (95%).
Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): After presenting the clear signs, the Surah contrasts them with the reaction of the arrogant disbeliever. “These are the verses of Allah which We recite to you in truth. Then in what statement after Allah and His verses will they believe?” The passage then paints a devastating psychological profile of a specific type of disbeliever: “Woe to every sinful liar (affākin athīm).” This is the person who “hears the verses of Allah recited to him, then persists in arrogance as if he had not heard them.” He treats the verses with mockery. For such a person, a “humiliating punishment” is promised. Hellfire is their destination, and all their worldly gains and the “protectors” they took besides Allah will be utterly useless.
Referenced Timeline: Contemporary Makkah (7th Century CE).
Woe to every sinful liar Who hears the verses of Allah recited to him, then persists in arrogance as if he had not heard them. So give him tidings of a painful punishment. (45:7-8)
Analysis & Implication:
- Rhetorical Strategy: The verses create a powerful character sketch of the arrogant rejecter. His crime is not just disbelief, but the *attitude* with which he disbelieves: persistence (yuṣirru), arrogance (mustakbiran), and mockery (huzuwā). The phrase “as if he had not heard them” perfectly captures the essence of willful ignorance. The rhetorical question, “in what statement after Allah and His verses will they believe?” is a powerful indictment, suggesting that if one rejects the ultimate truth, there is nothing left but falsehood.
- Socio-Historical Connection: This was a direct description of the behavior of the Qurayshi elite, such as Al-Walid ibn Al-Mughirah or Abu Jahl. They would listen to the Prophet’s (ﷺ) recitation, sometimes even be moved by it in private, but would then publicly persist in their arrogant denial to maintain their social standing. This verse exposed their intellectual dishonesty. It told the community that these leaders were not rejecting the message because of a flaw in the message, but because of a flaw in their own character: a deep-seated arrogance that prevented them from submitting to the truth.
- Primary evidence: The detailed psychological profile of the arrogant disbeliever who mocks the verses is a direct reflection of the behavior of the Meccan leadership as described in Sira and Tafsir literature.
- Classical tafsir: Al-Tabari explains that the “sinful liar” is one who is accustomed to falsehood in his speech and sinful in his actions. His arrogance is so great that even after hearing the undeniable truth, his pride prevents him from acknowledging it. The “humiliating punishment” is a direct recompense for the arrogance he displayed in this life.
- Location/Context: Makkah.
- Primary Actors: The arrogant leaders of Quraysh.
- Function in Narrative: To provide a sharp, psychological diagnosis of the arrogant disbeliever, showing that their rejection stems from character flaws (pride, mockery) rather than intellectual reasons.
- Evidence Level: High (strong connection to the historical context).
🌊 Verse 45:12-15 — The Subjugated Universe and the Burden of Choice
Estimated placement in timeline: — Confidence: High (95%).
Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): The Surah now lists some of Allah’s immense favors to humanity, which the arrogant disbeliever ignores. “It is Allah who subjected to you the sea so that ships may sail upon it by His command… and that you may seek of His bounty; and perhaps you will be grateful.” The verse then makes a sweeping statement: “And He has subjected to you whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth – all from Him.” The entire cosmos is made to serve a purpose for humanity. The section then pivots to a command for the believers: “Tell those who have believed to forgive those who do not expect the days of Allah…” This is a call to patience and magnanimity. The passage concludes by re-affirming the principle of individual accountability: “Whoever does a righteous deed – it is for himself; and whoever does evil – it is against himself.”
Referenced Timeline: The Continuous Present (the order of the universe) and Contemporary Makkah (the command to the believers).
And He has subjected to you whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth – all from Him. Indeed, in that are signs for a people who give thought. (45:13)
Analysis & Implication:
- Rhetorical Strategy: The concept of “subjection” (sakhkhara) is profound. It frames the universe not as a neutral or hostile environment, but as a divinely-ordered system designed to support human life. This should logically lead to gratitude. The command for believers to “forgive” their persecutors is a stunning display of the moral high ground. At a time of intense persecution, this verse calls for a response of mercy, not revenge, framing it as a sign of their superior faith and their trust in God’s ultimate justice (“that He may recompense a people for what they used to earn”).
- Socio-Historical Connection: The command to forgive was a direct and difficult instruction for the oppressed Muslims in Makkah. It was a form of spiritual training, teaching them to rise above the tribal instinct for retaliation and to place their trust in a higher form of justice. It distinguished the nascent Muslim community by a radically different ethical standard. This verse was a crucial element in building the moral fortitude and character that would be needed to lead the community in the years to come.
- Primary evidence: The command to forgive persecutors in a Meccan context is a strong indicator of the period. This form of unilateral patience was the strategy before the community had the means to defend itself, and it served to build moral character.
- Classical tafsir: Ibn Kathir explains that the subjection of the universe is a sign of God’s immense power and grace. He interprets the command to forgive as an instruction to be patient with the harm received from the disbelievers and to leave their affair to Allah. This was the initial command, which was later supplemented by the verses of just retribution and fighting in the Medinan period when the community was established.
- Location/Context: Makkah.
- Primary Actors: Humanity, the believers.
- Function in Narrative: To highlight divine favors as a motive for gratitude, and to command the believers to adopt a high ethical posture of forgiveness towards their persecutors.
- Evidence Level: High (thematic consistency with the Meccan phase).
📜 Verse 45:16-20 — The Case Study of the Children of Israel: A Lesson in Division
Estimated placement in timeline: — Confidence: High (95%).
Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): The Surah now turns to a major historical case study: the Children of Israel. “And We did certainly give the Children of Israel the Scripture and judgement and prophethood, and We provided them with good things and preferred them over the worlds.” They were given every advantage: clear revelation and divine favor. However, the tragedy is then recounted: “And they did not differ except after knowledge had come to them – out of jealous animosity (baghyan) between themselves.” Their division was not born of ignorance, but of ego and rivalry after they had received the truth. The verses confirm that Allah will judge between them. The passage concludes by placing the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) on a clear “ordained way” (Shari’ah) and commanding him to follow it, and not the “desires of those who do not know.”
Referenced Timeline: Ancient History (The history of the Children of Israel).
And they did not differ except after knowledge had come to them – out of jealous animosity between themselves. (45:17)
Analysis & Implication:
- Rhetorical Strategy: The story of the Children of Israel serves as a powerful cautionary tale. It shows that receiving revelation is not, by itself, a guarantee of salvation. Knowledge can be a cause for division if it is coupled with arrogance and envy. This was a direct warning to the Muslim community, and to the Quraysh. The cause of religious conflict is diagnosed as a moral disease (baghyan) rather than an intellectual one. The term Shari’ah is used here, one of the few times it appears in a Meccan surah, indicating the establishment of a clear, divine legal and moral path.
- Socio-Historical Connection: The Quraysh had contact with Jewish tribes (especially in and around Madinah) and were aware of their religious divisions. This verse used an example they could see to warn them against falling into the same trap. It was also a pre-emptive warning to the nascent Muslim community: do not let ego, rivalry, and worldly desires divide you after this clear guidance has come to you. The command to the Prophet (ﷺ) to follow the divinely ordained `Shari’ah` and not the “desires” of the ignorant was a final declaration of independence from the man-made traditions of the Quraysh.
- Primary evidence: The use of the Children of Israel as a negative historical precedent for division is a recurring theme in the Qur’an. The use of the term `Shari’ah` points to a late Meccan period where the foundations of the Islamic legal/moral system were being solidified.
- Classical tafsir: Ibn Kathir explains that the Children of Israel were given clear proofs, but their scholars and leaders differed out of a desire for worldly leadership and a refusal to accept the truth from rivals. This envy-driven division is presented as the greatest crime after knowledge has been established. The Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) is commanded to adhere strictly to the perfect `Shari’ah` revealed to him and to ignore all other man-made paths.
- Location/Context: Makkah.
- Primary Actors: The Children of Israel, Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ).
- Function in Narrative: To provide a historical case study on how a favored nation can fall into ruin through division born of envy, serving as a powerful warning to both the Quraysh and the Muslim community.
- Evidence Level: High (central Qur’anic historical lesson).
⚖️ Verse 45:21-23 — The God of Personal Whim: A Diagnosis of Modernity
Estimated placement in timeline: — Confidence: High (95%).
Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): This section contains one of the most profound psychological diagnoses in the Qur’an. It begins by asking a powerful question about divine justice: “Or do those who commit evil deeds think that We will make them like those who believe and do righteous deeds… equal in their life and their death? Evil is that which they judge.” This refutes the idea that there are no ultimate consequences for one’s actions. The Surah then identifies the root of this flawed worldview: “Have you seen the one who takes as his god his own desire (hawāh)?” This person is so lost that “Allah has sent him astray due to knowledge,” sealing his senses so he cannot perceive the truth. This is the ultimate portrait of a sophisticated, intelligent person who has chosen their own ego and desires as their ultimate authority, rather than God.
Referenced Timeline: Contemporary Makkah (7th Century CE) and a timeless description of a human archetype.
Have you seen the one who takes as his god his own desire, and Allah has sent him astray due to knowledge and has set a seal upon his hearing and his heart and put over his vision a veil? So who will guide him after Allah? (45:23)
Analysis & Implication:
- Rhetorical Strategy: The passage makes a powerful case for the necessity of the Hereafter based on justice. It’s morally inconceivable that the righteous and the evil should have the same outcome. The diagnosis of taking desire (hawā) as a god is a stunning insight. It moves beyond the critique of external idols (stones and statues) to the internal idol of the self, the ego. The phrase “sent him astray due to knowledge” is chilling. It suggests that a person can be intelligent, educated, and knowledgeable, but if their ultimate criterion for truth is their own desire, that very knowledge becomes a tool for their own misguidance.
- Socio-Historical Connection: While the Quraysh worshipped external idols, this verse exposed the internal idol that truly drove them: their desires for power, wealth, status, and the preservation of their traditions. This was a far deeper and more personal critique. It was a message that resonated beyond simple idolatry and spoke to the universal human tendency to prioritize personal whim over objective truth. For the arrogant leaders of Makkah, who saw themselves as intelligent and sophisticated, this was a devastating diagnosis.
- Primary evidence: The sophisticated psychological critique of “worshipping desire” is a feature of late Meccan surahs, which moved from critiquing crude idolatry to dissecting the intellectual and psychological roots of disbelief.
- Classical tafsir: Ibn Abbas, as quoted by Al-Tabari, explained that this verse refers to a person who does not do anything except what his soul desires. Whatever seems good to his ego, he does it. This makes his `hawā` his ultimate authority, his “god.” The verse shows that this is the most insidious form of shirk, as the person may not even be bowing to a physical idol.
- Location/Context: Makkah.
- Primary Actors: The archetype of the person who follows their own desires.
- Function in Narrative: To provide a deep, psychological diagnosis of the root of modern and ancient disbelief: the deification of the self and its desires.
- Evidence Level: High (core Qur’anic psychological concept).
⏳ Verse 45:24-26 — The Atheist’s Creed: “It is Only Time That Destroys Us”
Estimated placement in timeline: — Confidence: High (95%).
Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): The Surah now quotes the specific philosophy of the most extreme materialists among the Arabs. “And they say, ‘There is not but our worldly life; we die and we live, and nothing destroys us except time (ad-dahr).'” This is the creed of the Dahrites, a pre-Islamic Arab group who believed that time was the ultimate force, causing birth, decay, and death in an endless, meaningless cycle. They had “no knowledge of that; they are only guessing.” When the verses of the Qur’an are recited to them, their only argument is the familiar, foolish challenge: “Bring back our forefathers, if you should be truthful.” The divine response is simple and decisive: “Say, ‘Allah gives you life; then He causes you to die; then He will assemble you for the Day of Resurrection, about which there is no doubt…'”
Referenced Timeline: Contemporary Makkah (7th Century CE).
And they say, “There is not but our worldly life; we die and we live, and nothing destroys us except time.” (45:24)
Analysis & Implication:
- Rhetorical Strategy: By quoting their exact philosophy, the Qur’an puts their worldview on trial. It is dismissed not through a complex counter-argument, but by stating that it is based on mere “guessing” (ẓann) and not knowledge (‘ilm). This undermines its intellectual credibility. Their demand to bring back the dead is shown to be a childish and irrelevant challenge. The response is to simply re-state the true sequence of events as decreed by the ultimate authority, Allah.
- Socio-Historical Connection: This verse provides a fascinating window into the intellectual landscape of pre-Islamic Arabia. It wasn’t just populated by simple idolaters; there were also groups with more developed philosophical, albeit materialistic, worldviews. The Dahrites (from *dahr*, time) were essentially fatalistic atheists. The Qur’an addresses them directly, showing that its message was not just for idol worshippers, but was a comprehensive response to all forms of disbelief, from the most primitive to the most philosophical.
- Primary evidence: The specific and unique philosophical statement about “time” (ad-dahr) being the destructive force is a direct quote of a known pre-Islamic belief, making this a very specific and historically located refutation.
- Classical tafsir: Ibn Kathir explains that this was the belief of the Arab materialists and atheists. They believed in a cycle of life and death with no resurrection. A famous Hadith Qudsi directly addresses this, where Allah (SWT) says, “The son of Adam abuses Me. He curses time, and I am time (i.e., the controller of time), in My hand is the night and the day.” This hadith shows that cursing time is tantamount to cursing God, who is the ultimate power behind it.
- Location/Context: Makkah.
- Primary Actors: The Dahrites (Arab materialists).
- Function in Narrative: To identify and refute the specific philosophy of the Arab materialists, showing that the Qur’an addresses all forms of disbelief, not just idolatry.
- Evidence Level: High (addresses a specific, documented pre-Islamic philosophy).
kneeling Verse 45:27-32 — The Day of Kneeling: Every Nation and Its Book
Estimated placement in timeline: — Confidence: High (95%).
Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): This is the climactic scene that gives the Surah its name. “And to Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth. And the Day the Hour is established – that Day the falsifiers will lose.” The scene is then described: “And you will see every nation kneeling (jāthiyah).” Every community, from the beginning of time to the end, will be on its knees out of awe and terror. “Every nation will be called to its record [and told], ‘This Day you will be recompensed for what you used to do. This, Our record, speaks about you in truth. Indeed, We were recording what you used to do.'” The verses then contrast the fate of the believers (mercy and gardens) with the disbelievers, who will be asked, “Were not My verses recited to you, but you were arrogant…?” Their denial and mockery will be brought forth as the final evidence against them.
Referenced Timeline: Eschatological Time (The Day of Judgment).
And you will see every nation kneeling. Every nation will be called to its record… “This, Our record, speaks about you in truth. Indeed, We were recording what you used to do.” (45:28-29)
Analysis & Implication:
- Rhetorical Strategy: The image of “every nation kneeling” is one of profound and universal submission. In this life, nations and their leaders stand proud and arrogant. On that Day, all will be brought to their knees before the one true King. The concept of being called to “your record” personalizes the judgment. It’s not a general trial; it is a direct confrontation with one’s own, perfectly recorded life. The record itself is personified: it “speaks about you in truth,” leaving no room for denial or argument.
- Socio-Historical Connection: For the Quraysh, who derived their pride from their tribal and national identity, the vision of *every* nation, including their own, kneeling in humbled submission was a powerful equalizer. It stripped away all worldly distinctions of power and prestige. It told them that their tribal identity would not save them; they would be judged by the same divine standard as every other nation that had ever existed. The Book of Deeds was a terrifying concept for an oral culture, promising a form of permanent, unalterable record-keeping that they could not argue their way out of.
- Primary evidence: The detailed, panoramic, and awe-inspiring depiction of the Day of Judgment is the thematic climax of the Surah, a common feature in late Meccan surahs designed to leave a lasting and powerful impression.
- Classical tafsir: Ibn Kathir explains that `jāthiyah` means kneeling due to the intense fear and awe of the situation. He notes that every single person will be given their own book of deeds, which has recorded everything, small and great. The question posed to the disbelievers, “Were not My verses recited to you…?”, is a final rebuke to establish their guilt before their punishment is announced.
- Location/Context: Makkah.
- Primary Actors: All of resurrected humanity.
- Function in Narrative: To provide the ultimate, awe-inspiring vision of the Day of Judgment, showing the universal submission of all nations and the perfect, inescapable justice of God’s record.
- Evidence Level: High (thematic and narrative climax of the Surah).
👑 Verse 45:33-37 — The Final Declaration of Majesty
Estimated placement in timeline: — Confidence: High (95%).
Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): The Surah concludes with the final verdict on the disbelievers. “And the evil of what they did will appear to them, and they will be enveloped by what they used to ridicule.” Their punishment is a direct manifestation of their own mockery. They are told, “This Day you will be forgotten as you forgot the meeting of this Day of yours.” Their ultimate abode is the Fire, because they “took the verses of Allah in ridicule and were deluded by worldly life.” The Surah ends not with punishment, but with a soaring declaration of praise and majesty, summarizing all the arguments that came before. “So to Allah belongs [all] praise… And to Him belongs [all] majesty within the heavens and the earth. And He is the Exalted in Might, the Wise.”
Referenced Timeline: Eschatological Time and The Eternal Present.
And to Him belongs [all] majesty within the heavens and the earth. And He is the Exalted in Might, the Wise. (45:37)
Analysis & Implication:
- Rhetorical Strategy: The final verses deliver a powerful sense of poetic justice. The punishment is to be “enveloped” by the very thing they mocked. The verdict of being “forgotten” is a terrifying recompense for having “forgotten” the Day of Judgment. The Surah then concludes, as it began, with the two divine names that encapsulate the entire message: “the Exalted in Might” (Al-‘Azīz), whose justice is inescapable, and “the Wise” (Al-Ḥakīm), whose creation and decrees are perfect. It is a perfect, symmetrical ending.
- Socio-Historical Connection: The final praise is the ultimate answer to the arrogance of the Quraysh. Their claims to pride, power, and majesty are shown to be utterly false. True majesty (al-kibriyā’) belongs only to God. For the believers, this was a final affirmation of the truth they had chosen. For the disbelievers, it was a final declaration of the absolute and unchallengeable reality they had spent their lives denying.
- Primary evidence: The symmetrical structure of the Surah, beginning and ending with the same divine names (`Al-‘Azīz`, `Al-Ḥakīm`) and themes of revelation and majesty, is a sign of its cohesive and powerful rhetorical design.
- Classical tafsir: Al-Tabari explains that their being “forgotten” means they will be left in the punishment, just as they left and abandoned the preparation for this Day. The final declaration of praise is the natural and necessary conclusion after witnessing the signs of God’s power, justice, and wisdom throughout the Surah. All arguments end, and only the praise of His majesty remains.
- Location/Context: Makkah.
- Primary Actors: Allah (SWT).
- Function in Narrative: To deliver the final verdict on the disbelievers and to conclude the Surah with a powerful and definitive declaration of Allah’s praise and absolute majesty.
- Evidence Level: High (thematic and narrative conclusion).
📚 References
Share this article
Written by : TheLastDialogue
A Synthesis of Religions: The Case of God
Praise belongs to God, the Lord of all realms, the Originator of the heavens and the earth, the One who shaped the human being from clay and breathed into him of His Spirit; the One who sent Messengers, one after another, bearing truth, guidance, and the balance, so that mankind may stand upon justice and not transgress its bounds.
Here is a discourse meant not to conquer but to illuminate, Not to divide but to gather, Not to exalt the writer but to exalt the Word of God. So approach with hearts unburdened, With intellects awakened, With spirits yearning for the Mercy of the All-Merciful. For the earth endures by His command, And knowledge is a trust, And every soul shall be returned to its Lord.
The Last Dialogue (thelastdialogue.org) recognized as a pivotal resource in comparative theology. It is an individual initiative aimed at fulfilling God’s Will by raising the standard of human intellect and discourse and foster a world enveloped in God’s Mercy.
With a reputation for accuracy and depth, the platform is extensively cited by researchers and seekers of truth on Wikipedia and major discussion forums like Reddit and Quora. It serves as a meeting point for Abrahamic traditions, garnering respect and citations from scholars of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam alike.
It distinguishes itself as the sole religious platform adhering to the noble tradition of not soliciting charity, zakat, or donations – a practice aligned with the true Sunnah of Prophets.
قُلْ مَا أَسْأَلُكُمْ عَلَيْهِ مِنْ أَجْرٍ وَمَا أَنَا مِنَ الْمُتَكَلِّفِينَ
Say, "I do not ask you for this any payment, and I am not of the pretentious.





