Surah Sajdah Timeline – Historical Context & Key Events

By Published On: November 25, 2025Last Updated: November 25, 20254444 words22.3 min read

Nothing Found

In the name of God

📜 The Ultimate Timeline of Surah As-Sajdah (The Prostration): A Verse-by-Verse Chronology & Context

Mapping Revelation to History, Verse by Verse

Methodology: Textual-contextual + Tafsir consensus + Historical inference — Confidence shown per item.

✨ Introduction

What’s the difference between hearing the truth and truly believing it? And what physical act separates the arrogant from the humble in the eyes of God? Surah As-Sajdah, a short but immensely powerful chapter recited by the Prophet (ﷺ) every Friday dawn, answers these questions with cosmic clarity. This verse-by-verse timeline will journey through its verses, revealed in Makkah to dismantle the stubborn denial of the Resurrection, showing how the arc of creation, from a speck of dust to a full human being, is the ultimate proof of our final return to God.

📗 Surah As-Sajdah – Overview

🪶 Arabic Name: سورة السجدة (Surat as-Sajdah)

📝 Meaning: “The Prostration”

📍 Classification: Makki (Meccan), with some scholars holding a few verses to be Medinan.

🔢 Total Verses: 30

⏳ Chronological Order of Revelation: Approximately the 75th Surah revealed, placing it in the middle-to-late Meccan period.

📖 Key Themes: The divine origin of the Qur’an, Proofs of creation and resurrection, The contrast between the believer and the disbeliever, The act of prostration as the ultimate sign of faith, The legacy of Prophet Musa (as).

🗓️ Surah As-Sajdah Timeline Snapshot Table

Verse RangeApprox. Revelation PeriodKey Event or ContextMajor Theme
1–3Mid-MeccanAsserting the divine origin of the Qur’an against claims of fabrication.Revelation, Truth
4–9Mid-MeccanDescribing Allah’s cosmic and human creation as a proof of His power and wisdom.Creation, Tawhid
10–14Mid-MeccanDirectly refuting the denial of resurrection and describing the regret of the disbelievers.Resurrection, Accountability
15–22Mid-Meccan / Medinan (disputed)Contrasting the true believers who prostrate with the arrogant disbelievers.Faith vs. Disbelief, Prostration
23–25Mid-MeccanCiting the scripture of Musa (as) as a historical precedent for divine guidance.Prophetic History
26–30Mid-MeccanFinal proofs from history and nature, and a command to the Prophet (ﷺ) to turn away.Divine Signs, Patience

🕰️ Surah As-Sajdah Chronological Verse Timeline & Contextual Framework

Here we dive deep, section by section, to understand the “why” behind the “what.” We follow the Surah’s order, but analyze two timelines for each block: the context of its revelation (Asbab al-Nuzul) and the historical period it describes (Narrative Time).

📖 Verse 32:1-3 — A Book Beyond Doubt: Confronting the Fabrication Charge

Estimated placement in timeline: Confidence: High.

Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): The Surah opens with the mysterious letters `Alif, Lam, Mim`, immediately followed by a powerful, definitive statement about the Qur’an’s origin. “The revelation of the Book, about which there is no doubt, is from the Lord of the worlds.” This was a direct, preemptive strike against the primary accusation of the Quraysh leaders in Makkah. Unable to challenge the Qur’an’s eloquence, they attacked its source, claiming, “He has fabricated it.” The verse swiftly dismisses this: “Rather, it is the truth from your Lord.” The purpose of this truth is then stated: “that you may warn a people to whom no warner has come before you, that they might be guided.”

Referenced Timeline: Contemporary Makkah (7th Century CE).

The revelation of the Book, about which there is no doubt, is from the Lord of the worlds. Or do they say, “He has fabricated it”? Rather, it is the truth from your Lord… (32:2-3)

Analysis & Implication:

  • Rhetorical Strategy: The opening is a powerful assertion of certainty (`la rayba fih`). It doesn’t debate; it declares. By quoting the opposition’s argument (“Or do they say, ‘He has fabricated it?'”) and then immediately refuting it (“Rather, it is the truth…”), the Qur’an seizes control of the narrative and portrays the disbelievers’ claim as a baseless, desperate alternative to the obvious truth.
  • Socio-Historical Connection: This opening addresses the core intellectual battle of the Meccan period. The Quraysh were trying to frame the Prophet (ﷺ) as a `muftarin` (a fabricator, a forger). This verse re-frames him as a `nadhir` (a warner) and the Qur’an as `al-haqq` (the Truth). It also highlights the historical significance of his mission to the Arabs, a people who had not received a messenger in the direct lineage of Isma’il for centuries.
  • Primary evidence: The focus on the `tanzil` (revelation) of the Book and the direct refutation of the fabrication charge are defining features of Meccan surahs that were revealed when the opposition’s arguments had crystallized.
  • Classical tafsir: Al-Tabari explains that the statement “about which there is no doubt” is a challenge. The clarity and power of the Qur’an’s message and style are such that no reasonable person should have any doubt about its divine origin.
  • Location/Context: Makkah
  • Primary Actors: Allah (SWT), The Quraysh, Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ)
  • Function in Narrative: Overture; Asserting the divine origin and purpose of the Qur’an
  • Evidence Level: High – The content is a classic Meccan polemical opening, addressing the central challenge to the Prophet’s mission.
Cross-references: Qur’an 2:2 (“This is the Book about which there is no doubt…”), Qur’an 10:37.

🌌 Verse 32:4-6 — The Cosmic Manager: Creation in Six Days and the Ascent of Command

Estimated placement in timeline: Confidence: High.

Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): After asserting the Qur’an is from the “Lord of the worlds,” these verses define who that Lord is through His cosmic actions. “It is Allah who created the heavens and the earth… in six days and then established Himself above the Throne.” This establishes His power as Creator. Then, a profound statement about His governance: “He arranges [every] matter from the heaven to the earth; then it will ascend to Him in a Day, the measure of which is a thousand years of what you count.” This was revealed to a Meccan audience that had a very localized, tribal concept of authority. These verses presented them with a vision of a single, omnipotent Sovereign managing the entire cosmos from a central point of command, with all affairs returning to Him.

Referenced Timeline: Deep Time (Creation) & The Continuous Present (Divine Governance).

Analysis & Implication:

  • Rhetorical Strategy: The verses paint a picture of immense scale and perfect order. The concept of a divine “matter” or “command” (`amr`) ascending to God in a day that equals a millennium of human time is designed to inspire awe and to illustrate the vast difference between the divine and human scales of existence. It establishes God as both the transcendent Creator and the immanent, active Governor of the universe.
  • Socio-Historical Connection: This vision of centralized, cosmic governance was a direct challenge to the fragmented, polytheistic worldview of the Quraysh. Their pantheon of idols suggested a chaotic universe with multiple, competing powers. The Qur’an’s depiction of a single, orderly command structure flowing from the Throne was a call to a more rational and unified understanding of both the cosmos and, by extension, human society.
  • Primary evidence: The focus on `Tawhid ar-Rububiyyah` (Oneness of Lordship) demonstrated through cosmic creation and governance is a foundational argument of the Meccan surahs.
  • Classical tafsir: Ibn Kathir explains that the “ascent” of the matter refers to the reports of the angels concerning the deeds of the inhabitants of the earth, which are presented to Allah. This highlights His complete and constant awareness of all affairs. The “thousand years” is a metaphor for the immense scale of divine time and knowledge.
  • Location/Context: Makkah
  • Primary Actors: Allah (SWT) (as Creator and Governor)
  • Function in Narrative: Defining God’s power and sovereignty through His cosmic actions
  • Evidence Level: High – The content is a core part of the Qur’an’s theological argument for Tawhid, perfectly suited for the Meccan context.
Cross-references: Qur’an 7:54 (Creation in six days), Qur’an 70:4 (“The angels and the Spirit will ascend to Him in a Day the measure of which is fifty thousand years.”).

💧 Verse 32:7-9 — From Humble Fluid to Perfect Form: The Miracle of Human Creation

Estimated placement in timeline: Confidence: High.

Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): The Surah now zooms in from the cosmic scale to the human scale, presenting the creation of man as the prime evidence of God’s power and wisdom. It begins with a profound principle: God is the One “who perfected everything which He created.” It then traces the human journey: from an origin of clay (`tin`), to a lineage from a “despised fluid” (`ma’in mahin`), to being fashioned (`sawwahu`) and having the `ruh` (spirit) breathed into him. Finally, it highlights the gifts of hearing, sight, and hearts (`af’idah`), followed by a gentle rebuke: “little are you grateful.” This was a direct argument against the Quraysh’s denial of resurrection: the One who can perform this miracle of creation can surely perform the lesser miracle of re-creation.

Referenced Timeline: The Human Lifecycle / Deep Time (origin from clay).

[He] who perfected everything which He created and began the creation of man from clay. Then He made his posterity from an extract of a despised fluid. Then He proportioned him and breathed into him from His [created] soul and made for you hearing and vision and hearts; little are you grateful. (32:7-9)

Analysis & Implication:

  • Rhetorical Strategy: The passage is a powerful appeal to humility and wonder. By describing the seminal fluid as “despised,” it contrasts our humble, lowly physical origin with the immense honor of receiving the divine spirit and the noble faculties of perception and intellect. This contrast is designed to crush human arrogance.
  • Socio-Historical Connection: The Quraysh were obsessed with lineage and noble origins (`nasab`). This verse completely reframed the concept of origin. It told them that no matter how noble their tribe, their physical beginning was from a “despised fluid,” and their true honor came not from their ancestors, but from the divine spirit and faculties that Allah gifted them. Their failure to use these faculties to recognize the truth was the ultimate act of ingratitude.
  • Primary evidence: The use of the stages of human creation as a rational proof for the resurrection is a recurring and powerful argument in Meccan surahs, aimed at dismantling the core intellectual objection of the polytheists.
  • Classical tafsir: Al-Tabari explains that the `af’idah` (hearts/intellects) are mentioned last because they are the highest of these faculties—the tool by which a human can process the information from hearing and sight to arrive at the knowledge of their Creator.
  • Location/Context: Makkah
  • Primary Actors: Allah (as Creator), Mankind
  • Function in Narrative: A detailed proof of God’s power through the miracle of human creation
  • Evidence Level: High – This is a foundational Qur’anic argument perfectly suited for its Meccan audience.
Cross-references: Qur’an 23:12-14, Qur’an 22:5 (Similar passages on embryology).

💀 Verse 32:10-11 — “Will We Be a New Creation?”: The Angel of Death’s Appointment

Estimated placement in timeline: Confidence: High.

Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): After the clear proof from creation, the Surah now quotes the specific, mocking objection of the disbelievers in Makkah. “And they say, ‘When we are lost within the earth, will we indeed be in a new creation?'” This was their core argument, based on their materialistic worldview: once a body decomposes and becomes one with the soil, it’s impossible to bring it back. The divine response is sharp and direct. It first diagnoses their problem: “Rather, they are, in the meeting with their Lord, disbelievers.” Then, it gives a chillingly personal answer: “Say, ‘The angel of death will take you who has been entrusted with you. Then to your Lord you will be returned.'”

Referenced Timeline: Contemporary Makkah (the objection) & The Future (death and resurrection).

Analysis & Implication:

  • Rhetorical Strategy: The Qur’an doesn’t just refute their argument; it personalizes the process of their return to God. By invoking the `Malak al-Mawt` (Angel of Death), it transforms the abstract concept of death into an imminent, personal appointment with a specific, divinely-commissioned being. This is designed to be far more intimidating than a general discussion of decomposition.
  • Socio-Historical Connection: The Quraysh’s denial was a comfortable intellectual buffer that allowed them to live without a sense of ultimate accountability. This verse shatters that buffer. It tells them that their return to God is not a matter of debate; it’s a scheduled appointment with an agent who has been “entrusted” with the task. This framing turned their philosophical question into a terrifyingly concrete future event.
  • Primary evidence: The direct quotation of the disbelievers’ arguments about resurrection is a central feature of the Meccan surahs, showing the Qur’an’s real-time engagement with their polemics.
  • Classical tafsir: Ibn Kathir explains that the verse personalizes death to each individual. The Angel of Death has assistants, but each soul has an appointed angel responsible for taking it at its decreed time, emphasizing the precision and inescapability of the divine decree.
  • Location/Context: Makkah
  • Primary Actors: The Quraysh, The Angel of Death
  • Function in Narrative: Directly refuting the denial of resurrection with the certainty of death
  • Evidence Level: High – This is a direct rebuttal to the primary intellectual objection of the Meccan polytheists.
Cross-references: Qur’an 23:82 (“They say, ‘When we have died and become dust and bones, will we really be resurrected?'”).

😔 Verse 32:12-14 — The Day of Regret: “If Only You Could See…”

Estimated placement in timeline: Confidence: High.

Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): The Surah now transports the listener to the Day of Judgment to witness the ultimate state of the disbelievers. The verse opens with a powerful address to the Prophet (ﷺ): “If you could but see when the criminals are hanging their heads before their Lord…” It’s a scene of utter humiliation and regret. They will cry, “Our Lord, we have now seen and heard, so send us back; we will do righteousness; indeed, we are now certain.” Their plea for a second chance is a futile one. The divine verdict is final: the word that Hell will be filled with jinn and men has already come to pass. The final rebuke is devastating: “So taste [the punishment] because you forgot the meeting of this Day of yours…”

Referenced Timeline: Eschatological Time (The Day of Judgment).

“Our Lord, we have now seen and heard, so send us back; we will do righteousness; indeed, we are now certain [in faith].” (32:12)

Analysis & Implication:

  • Rhetorical Strategy: The verse uses a conditional phrase (“If you could but see…”) to create a vivid, cinematic scene in the listener’s mind. It’s a preview of the future that serves as a warning in the present. The criminals’ confession, “we have now seen and heard,” is the ultimate irony; they are finally using the faculties that Allah gave them, but it is too late.
  • Socio-Historical Connection: For the arrogant Quraysh chiefs who walked around Makkah with their heads held high, this image of them “hanging their heads” in shame before God was the ultimate reversal of their worldly status. It was a powerful message that their current pride was a prelude to their eternal humiliation. For the believers, it was a promise of ultimate justice.
  • Primary evidence: The depiction of the regret of the damned and their futile request for a second chance is a recurring and powerful theme in Meccan surahs, designed to shake the listeners out of their complacency.
  • Classical tafsir: Al-Tabari explains that their certainty (`muqinun`) in the Hereafter is useless because it is a certainty born of direct sight, not of faith in the unseen (`iman bil-ghayb`), which was the actual test of this worldly life.
  • Location/Context: Makkah
  • Primary Actors: The Disbelievers on Judgment Day
  • Function in Narrative: A vivid depiction of the regret and humiliation of the disbelievers
  • Evidence Level: High – This is classic Qur’anic eschatology, a core component of the Meccan message.
Cross-references: Qur’an 23:99-100 (“My Lord, send me back…”), Qur’an 6:27.

🙇‍♂️ Verse 32:15-17 — The Act of Prostration: The Physical Sign of True Belief

Estimated placement in timeline: Confidence: High.

Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): This is the pivotal verse that gives the Surah its name. After describing the arrogant who refuse to believe, the Surah now defines the true believers by their physical and spiritual response to the Qur’an. “Only those believe in Our verses who, when they are reminded by them, fall down in prostration and exalt [Allah] with praise of their Lord, and they are not arrogant.” This physical act of `sajdah` (prostration) is presented as the ultimate antidote to the spiritual disease of `istikbar` (arrogance) that afflicts the disbelievers. The passage goes on to describe their private devotion: their sides forsake their beds to pray at night in “fear and hope,” and they spend in charity from what Allah has provided. Their ultimate reward, it says, is a hidden delight that “no soul knows.”

Referenced Timeline: The Continuous Present (a description of the true believer).

Analysis & Implication:

  • Rhetorical Strategy: The verse creates a powerful, binary distinction. The disbeliever hears the verses and turns away in pride. The believer hears the same verses and instinctively falls to the ground in humility. The act of prostration is thus framed as the physical manifestation of `iman` and the ultimate symbol of submission.
  • Socio-Historical Connection: In the status-conscious society of Makkah, putting one’s forehead on the ground was a profound act of submission. The Quraysh leaders refused to do this, seeing it as demeaning. For the believers, this act was a liberation from the false pride of tribe and status, a direct acknowledgment that the only one worthy of such submission is the Creator. The practice of night prayer (`tahajjud`) also became a defining characteristic of this core group of early, deeply committed Muslims.
  • Primary evidence: The Prophet’s (ﷺ) established Sunnah of reciting this Surah in the Fajr prayer on Fridays and prostrating at this verse gives it a special liturgical and historical significance.
  • Classical tafsir: Ibn Kathir contrasts the state of the believers with the disbelievers. While the disbelievers are in their beds, heedless, the believers have forsaken their comfort to stand before their Lord in the intimacy of the night, demonstrating the sincerity of their faith.
  • Location/Context: Makkah
  • Primary Actors: The True Believers
  • Function in Narrative: Defining the true believer through the act of prostration and night worship
  • Evidence Level: Very High – This is the central verse of the Surah, and its themes are a perfect match for the Meccan focus on building core faith and practice.
Cross-references: Qur’an 17:107-109, Hadith on the Prophet’s (ﷺ) recitation of this Surah on Fridays (Sahih al-Bukhari).

⚖️ Verse 32:18-22 — “Are They Equal?”: The Believer vs. The Defiant

Estimated placement in timeline: Confidence: Interpretive.

Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): The Surah continues the stark contrast. It asks a powerful rhetorical question: “Then is one who was a believer like one who was defiantly disobedient? They are not equal.” The verses then detail the different outcomes: believers will have Gardens of Refuge, while the disobedient (`fasiq`) will have the Fire as their refuge, from which they can never escape. Some scholars have linked this verse to a specific incident in Madinah where some Muslims taunted disbelievers like Walid ibn ‘Uqbah about their respective fates, prompting this revelation. Others maintain it is a general Meccan statement that simply continues the theme of contrasting the two groups.

Referenced Timeline: The Hereafter.

Analysis & Implication:

  • Rhetorical Strategy: The question “Are they equal?” is designed to be self-evident. The Qur’an posits that it would be a violation of divine justice for the one who submits and the one who rebels to have the same outcome. The passage then describes the punishment as a taste of the “nearer punishment” (in this world) before the “greater punishment” (in the Hereafter), reinforcing the theme of worldly calamities being a warning.
  • Socio-Historical Connection: If Meccan, this verse served to boost the morale of the believers, assuring them that their current worldly weakness was not a reflection of their ultimate status. If Medinan, it served as a direct rebuke to specific individuals who were openly defiant and proud of their disbelief even after the truth had become dominant in the city. In either context, it reinforces the unbridgeable moral and eschatological gap between faith and disbelief.
  • Primary evidence: The general theme of contrasting believers and disbelievers is Meccan. However, the term `fasiq` (defiantly disobedient) is often used in Medinan contexts to describe hypocrites or open sinners. The specific Asbab al-Nuzul cited by some commentators points to a Medinan context.
  • Classical tafsir: As-Suyuti and others narrate the report that this verse was revealed concerning ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib (representing the believer) and Walid ibn ‘Uqbah (representing the `fasiq`). This specific naming of individuals gives strong weight to the Medinan interpretation, though the verse’s style and placement feel Meccan.
  • Location/Context: Mixed (Potentially Medinan verses within a Meccan Surah)
  • Primary Actors: The Believer (archetype), The `Fasiq` (archetype)
  • Function in Narrative: Emphasizing the absolute difference in the ultimate status of the faithful and the faithless
  • Evidence Level: Interpretive – The strong possibility of a specific Medinan context for these verses makes their placement in a Meccan surah a subject of scholarly discussion.
Cross-references: Qur’an 45:21 (“Or do those who commit evil deeds think We will make them like those who believe and do righteous deeds…?”).

📜 Verse 32:23-25 — The Book of Musa: A Precedent for Leadership and Guidance

Estimated placement in timeline: Confidence: High.

Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): The Surah now presents its final historical example, referencing the scripture given to Musa (Moses). “And We certainly gave Moses the Scripture, so do not be in doubt of the meeting with him.” This verse reassures the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) that his experience of receiving a Book and facing denial is a shared prophetic experience. The key lesson is then drawn: “And We made from among them leaders guiding by Our command when they were patient and were certain of Our signs.” This verse provides the two essential ingredients for true leadership in the cause of God: `sabr` (patience, perseverance) and `yaqin` (certainty).

Referenced Timeline: The Age of Prophets (c. 13th Century BCE).

Analysis & Implication:

  • Rhetorical Strategy: The reference to Musa’s Book serves as a historical anchor, connecting the Qur’an to the established tradition of divine revelation. The verse that defines the qualifications for leadership is a profound summary of the entire prophetic struggle. It’s not about power or lineage; it’s about the internal qualities of patience in the face of trials and absolute certainty in God’s promise.
  • Socio-Historical Connection: This was a direct piece of leadership advice for the Prophet (ﷺ) and a curriculum for his companions. At a time when they were being severely tested in Makkah, this verse told them that their `sabr` was the very quality that was forging them into the future leaders of the Ummah. It was a divine affirmation that their current trials were a necessary part of their training.
  • Primary evidence: The use of Musa’s story as a direct parallel and source of strength for the Prophet (ﷺ) is a recurring theme in Meccan surahs. The focus on `sabr` and `yaqin` is perfectly suited to the needs of a persecuted community.
  • Classical tafsir: Scholars like Ibn Taymiyyah have famously commented on this verse, stating, “With patience and certainty, leadership in religion is attained.” It is considered a foundational verse on the qualities of true Islamic leadership.
  • Location/Context: Makkah
  • Primary Actors: Prophet Musa (as), The leaders of the Israelites
  • Function in Narrative: Providing a historical model for leadership and the qualities required to attain it
  • Evidence Level: High – The content is a perfect thematic fit for the leadership training of the Prophet and his companions in Makkah.
Cross-references: Qur’an 21:73 (“And We made them leaders guiding by Our command…”).

🚶 Verse 32:26-30 — The Final Warning: Turn Away and Wait

Estimated placement in timeline: Confidence: High.

Context & Events (Asbab al-Nuzul): The Surah draws to a close with a final set of warnings and a concluding command to the Prophet (ﷺ). It returns to the proofs from history and nature. First, history: “Has it not become clear to them how many generations We destroyed before them, [as] they walk among their dwellings?” This again urges the traveling Meccans to see the ruins of past civilizations as a warning. Second, nature: “Do they not see that We drive water to the barren land and bring forth thereby crops…?” This is the final reminder of the proof of resurrection. The Surah ends by addressing the disbelievers’ taunt, “When is this conquest…?” The divine answer is that on that Day, their faith will be of no use. The final command to the Prophet is one of dignified disengagement: “So turn away from them and wait. Indeed, they are waiting.”

Referenced Timeline: Contemporary Makkah (7th Century CE).

So turn away from them and wait. Indeed, they are waiting. (32:30)

Analysis & Implication:

  • Rhetorical Strategy: The ending is a powerful act of turning the tables. Both sides are “waiting.” The disbelievers are waiting for the Muslims to fail and disappear. The Muslims are waiting for the inevitable victory and judgment promised by Allah. It frames the conflict as a test of time, with the final outcome already guaranteed. The command to “turn away” (`a’rid ‘anhum`) is not one of despair, but of confident disengagement from a fruitless argument.
  • Socio-Historical Connection: This was the final instruction for the Meccan phase. The arguments had been made, the proofs had been presented, and the hearts of the arrogant were sealed. The time for debate was drawing to a close. This verse signaled a shift in strategy: focus on the believers, disengage from the mockers, and wait patiently for Allah’s decree to unfold. It was a prelude to the next phase of the mission: the Hijra.
  • Primary evidence: The command to “turn away” and “wait” is a common concluding theme in late Meccan surahs, signifying a rhetorical culmination after all arguments have been exhausted.
  • Classical tafsir: Al-Tabari explains that this is a command to the Prophet (ﷺ) to entrust their affair to Allah and to stop engaging with them in debate, as they are an intractable people. He should wait for Allah’s judgment between them, and they can wait for the misfortune they expect to befall him.
  • Location/Context: Makkah
  • Primary Actors: Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), The Quraysh
  • Function in Narrative: Grand conclusion; A final command for patient disengagement while awaiting God’s verdict
  • Evidence Level: High – This verse perfectly encapsulates the strategic and psychological posture of the Muslims at the end of the Meccan period.
Cross-references: Qur’an 50:45 (“…but remind by the Qur’an whoever fears My threat.”), Qur’an 43:89.
Image showing Quran and Surah Luqman Written On ItSurah Luqman Timeline – Historical Context & Key Events
Image showing Quran and Surah Ahzab Written On ItSurah Ahzab Timeline – Historical Context & Key Events

Share this article

gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAAAAACH5BAEKAAEALAAAAAABAAEAAAICTAEAOw==
Written by : TheLastDialogue

A Synthesis of Religions: The Case of God

Praise belongs to God, the Lord of all realms, the Originator of the heavens and the earth, the One who shaped the human being from clay and breathed into him of His Spirit; the One who sent Messengers, one after another, bearing truth, guidance, and the balance, so that mankind may stand upon justice and not transgress its bounds.

Here is a discourse meant not to conquer but to illuminate,
 Not to divide but to gather,
 Not to exalt the writer but to exalt the Word of God. So approach with hearts unburdened,
 With intellects awakened,
 With spirits yearning for the Mercy of the All-Merciful. For the earth endures by His command,
 And knowledge is a trust,
 And every soul shall be returned to its Lord.

The Last Dialogue (thelastdialogue.org) recognized as a pivotal resource in comparative theology. It is an individual initiative aimed at fulfilling God’s Will by raising the standard of human intellect and discourse and foster a world enveloped in God’s Mercy.

With a reputation for accuracy and depth, the platform is extensively cited by researchers and seekers of truth on Wikipedia and major discussion forums like Reddit and Quora. It serves as a meeting point for Abrahamic traditions, garnering respect and citations from scholars of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam alike.

It distinguishes itself as the sole religious platform adhering to the noble tradition of not soliciting charity, zakat, or donations – a practice aligned with the true Sunnah of Prophets.

قُلْ مَا أَسْأَلُكُمْ عَلَيْهِ مِنْ أَجْرٍ وَمَا أَنَا مِنَ الْمُتَكَلِّفِينَ

Say, "I do not ask you for this any payment, and I am not of the pretentious.